Posts tagged: school

Films that Teach

By , October 8, 2011 10:48 am

Brad Mehldau – Exit Music (For a Film)

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Being a teacher for the last 7 years has utterly ruined my ability to watch films and enjoy them on their own merits. As the opening titles scroll forward, I think about my classroom. As the plot develops, I think about my school setting. As you get to know the film characters, I think about the LAUSD administrators and managers. While I suppose some may see this as an asset, it can be a bit annoying at times.

As evidence, I present the last 3 films (“Buck”, “Moneyball”, and “Contagion”) I’ve seen with the “teaching lessons” I’ve learned as a result.


image

Title: Buck

Actual plot: This documentary portrays real-life horse whisperer “Buck” Branaman as an ordinary man who has made an extraordinary life despite tremendous odds.

Teaching Take-away: You can be firm without being harsh. You can be strict without being disrespectful.

 

 

 

 

 


image

Title: Moneyball

Actual plot: The story of Oakland A’s general manager Billy Beane’s successful attempt to put together a baseball club on a budget by employing computer-generated analysis to draft his players.

Teaching Take-away: Use data, use data, use data…but use it right.

 

 

 

 

 


imageTitle: Contagion

Actual plot: A thriller centered on the threat posed by a deadly disease and an international team of doctors contracted by the CDC to deal with the outbreak.

Teaching Take-away: Always be sure to keep your classroom stocked with hand sanitizer.

 

 

 

 


Homework

By , July 4, 2011 1:52 pm

John Lee Hooker – Homework

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Back in the glory days of teaching (i.e. pre- July 1, 2011), an LAUSD teacher could use her best judgment to designate which portion of a student’s academic grade was represented of homework. For example, he might assign homework to be worth 25% of a students grade because he feels that a grade (which is looked at by colleges) should partially reflect the amount of hard work a student has put into a class. On the other hand, a teacher might choose her homework assignments to be worth a mere 5% of the grade, because she desires the vast majority (i.e. 95%) of it to be based on tests, quizzes, and projects, etc…

Those days are no longer.

The New Policy

Beginning on Friday, LAUSD has decreed that homework shall be weighted no more than 10% of a student’s grade. The two main reasons cited for this are (a) a desire to insure that an academic grade reflects academic knowledge learned, rather than mere compliance, and (b) a desire to not penalize students who may not have resources to adequately complete homework at home.

To be clear, what this new policy does not do is mandate the amount of homework teachers may assign. For example, a 7th grade student receiving 70 minutes of homework a night (“grade level x 10” is a generally agreed upon formula) is still likely to be assigned 70 minutes of homework a night. Yet what this policy does do is to explicitly state that that work may count for no more than 10% of the academic grade, hopefully resulting in a grade that is an accurate reflection of a student’s actual content learning.

The Reaction

Unsurprisingly, reaction to the new policy has been swift and varied, ranging from those who view it favorably to the extent that they think our Chief Academic Officer, Judy Elliot “should be put on a pedestal for getting such a policy through”, to those who decry the new policy and accuse LAUSD leadership of seeming to “think that lowering expectations for children is the way to go.” [Quotes chosen (very selectively) from the comment section of the L.A. Times, a section which tends to find far too few reasoned voices in a sea of unmitigated yelling].

Conducting a bit of Facebook research on my own, I posed the question as to whether this new policy is a good idea or a bad one, with the following choices and results:

image

On the whole, a majority (54%) of respondents seem to resonate with the concern that the policy will reduce an incentive to practice academics at home.

What was fairly interesting to me is that I had a small number (n=11) of former students weigh in as well, and likewise, 54% (i.e. 6) of them seemed to have concern with the potentially unintended consequence of de-weighting homework for students.

The coolest part of this unscientific polling was that many respondents left excellent comments after they had voted, some of which detailed their own past policies as teachers, or their thoughts on the long-term implications of a policy like this (including the potential financial implications, which I’d not heard brought to this discussion). These are definitely worth a read.

My Frustration

So my two cents? While I do think grades ought to be based on learning, rather than compliance, I very much resonated with the majority of responding teachers surveyed here. Also having just finished reading Wendy Kopp’s A Chance to Make History, one of the strongest factors she cites as elements that successful schools have emphasized is more time engaging the curriculum. And while this 10% homework weighting policy doesn’t reduce the amount of homework (a.k.a. time engaging the curriculum), it does reduce the connection between the “hard work” students put forth and the results that they see. If we’re not just teaching percentages, but also perseverance; if we’re not just teaching decimals, but also dedication; if we’re not just teaching fractions, but also fortitude; and if we’re serious about all kids being able to make it to college, then we’ve got to be serious about the kinds of academic habits it’s going to take to get them there. We must raise the bar, and unfortunately, this new policy may lower it.

My frustration with this district was only furthered as I tried to reach out in an attempt to serve my math department. Knowing that many teachers might have the same questions and concerns as I did, I emailed the district’s math person with the following two questions:

  • What are some strategies that math teachers can use to continue to instill in their students the importance and value of excellent home study habits, especially now that students will not see a direct connection between any effort they put into continuing academic practice at home and their academic grade?
  • What are some strategies math teachers can use to communicate this policy effectively to parents, many of which may see homework as a primary method to encourage their children’s academics and now must face the paradigm shift that the influence of homework is now merely indirect?

My hope is that someday I will work for a district that will support teachers and department chairs who take the initiative to reach out for it, rather than receive 17-word non-answers in response. (“The training suggestions and strategies could be found on the resources outlined in the memo.”) That was literally the response I got. If the “resources outlined” actually referred to some web links that were instantly viewable and addressed the questions I asked, the response would be alright. Unfortunately, the 3 resources cited are books, which do not host their content online, which leaves me with the options of leaving my questions unanswered as I try to serve my department, or go out and spend $87 on Amazon.com purchasing the resources the district is apparently supporting us with pointing us to.

Links:

5 Days Left of School

By , June 19, 2011 5:03 pm

Toy Dolls – The Final Countdown

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

In honor of the the last week of school, my post includes perhaps one of the most ridiculous cover songs I’ve ever heard. Europe’s The Final Countdown as performed by a band of seemingly drunken Irish kazoo players. Yep. You heard that right.

Yes, the kids are counting down the final days of school, including the number of minutes left. What they are (perhaps) unaware of is their teachers’ countdown as well. Summer months mean catching up on resting, catching up on reading, catching up with acquaintances, and getting to explore even more of this amazing city of Los Angeles.

Oh yeah, and the Mets come to town in about a week. Summer’s almost here. I can tell.

Guess how many days of school are left???

By , June 13, 2011 8:14 pm

Neil Cowley Trio – Revolution 9

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Why this post? Because in absence of much else to talk about at the moment (and even less time to write), it is simply worth mentioning that the end of school is nigh!

Only 9 Days Left! Unfortunately, I won’t get much of a summer (more on that in upcoming posts), so I’ll enjoy the countdown while I can.

Besides, who’d have ever thought that someone would be able to perform a cover of the Beatles’ Revolution 9.

Amazing.

What a Week

By , June 4, 2011 8:28 am

Oasis – Mucky Fingers

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

IMAG0295

We’re done with state testing. Conceivably, this should mean that things should be slowing down. Unfortunately, the opposite is true. A few anecdotes from the week.

  • Monday: Voluntarily subjecting myself to another morning of frustration, humiliation, and four-putts, I enjoyed another round of golf with representatives from the English and P.E. departments. On this beautiful morning we were treated to several fly-overs from a squadron of WWII-era aircraft, likely participating in one of the Memorial Day events occurring around the city. WIN
  • Wednesday: I must be crazy. I must be absolutely insane. On Wednesday, I interviewed for a 5-week summer fellowship with our district headquarters. It boiled down to three questions (unfortunately, not these three). First time I’d actually worn a tie in nearly a year. ???
  • Thursday: One of my students unwisely decides it’d be a good idea to imbibe a bit before arriving to class, then proceeds to vomit all over the classroom floor. Brilliant. Ironically, earlier in the week I had been wistfully remembering the days of carpeted classroom floors (unlike my tile); now, I consider myself lucky. More than being angry with this student, I was mostly sad because I’d seen her make so much progress in the year that I’d had her. FAIL
  • Friday (Part 1): Coachella tickets for next April went on sale today (yes – more than 10 MONTHS in advance). I sit in a waiting room for several hours but score 1 for each weekend. WIN
  • Friday (Part 2): Our drama teacher roped me into writing a 60-sec song for a TV commercial (for a doll) he’s doing with his drama students. It ended up being a pretty fun song, and he got a quintet of 7th graders to sing along. Very fun. However, in retrospect, I’m realizing that it sound fiendishly similar to this:

Hopefully, I’ll be able to avoid the George Harrison v. The Chiffons fiasco.

Becoming Unnecessary

By , April 23, 2011 11:52 am

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Students learn from Engkey, the robot at the Hagjeong Primary School in Daegu

They’ve done it. A robot teacher.

At least the version above is not as frightening as this one:

*********************************************************************************

Marina & the Diamonds – I Am Not a Robot

As if the education debates needed any more heat…

By , February 10, 2011 12:02 am

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

It’s only Wednesday, and there are already two major “journalistic” education wars that have begun in the last two days. On the positive side, these media wars evidence how important educational issues have become in major policies today. On the negative side, both of these spats are framed in the typical polarizing “either/or” manner, leaving very little room for reasonable and rational discussion.

Battle #1: L.A. Times v. National Education Policy Center (NAEP).

Background: In August of last year, the L.A. Times published a controversial series of articles (which I blogged a response to) which both evaluated thousands of district elementary teachers and then published their names in a searchable online database, galvanizing both sides of the “teacher effectiveness” debate, and winning the L.A. Times a journalist award.

The current issue: Everybody hold the phone. A University of Colorado researcher, affiliated with the NAEP just published a study which calls into question the validity of the L.A. Times’ choice of data variables to consider in their study. Basically, they say that by considering different variables in the teacher effectiveness study, one arrives at different results, which honestly, is not that revolutionary an idea (especially for anyone who’s ever taken an Algebra 1 or a Logic course).

The roof got blown off Monday when the L.A. Times picked up on this newly published study questioning their results, and reported on it as though it largely confirmed their results, namely, under the headline Separate study confirms many Los Angeles Times findings on teacher effectiveness. Naturally, the study’s authors felt this was a gross misinterpretation of their results so they published a line-by-line critique of Monday’s L.A. Times article. It’s absolutely scathing. Definitely worth a read just to see how journalists and researchers can get into cat fights.

Who wins this battle? Unfortunately, nobody, because the main point at hand, namely the fact that which variables are taken into account in teacher evaluations is an extremely important decision, is a point that is now lost in this back and forth game of journalistic mudslinging. The NAEP got it right, but it really didn’t take rocket science to figure it out. Rather than misguiding their readers with the ridiculous headline, the Times would have been better to simply come out and justify the reason they chose the variables they went with. Then we could actually have a meaningful conversation.

Battle #2: Michelle Rhee (former D.C. Chancellor of education) v. G.F. Brandenburg (blogger).

Background: Michelle Rhee, a former Teach For America corps member, went on to become a very powerful, yet very controversial Chancellor of the D.C. public schools. She has recently founded StudentsFirst, an organization which is essentially a lobbying group for certain educational policies among state legislators. Needless to say, some people love her policies, some people hate them.

The current issue: A week ago, blogger G.F. Brandenburg dug up some data which suggests that Rhee’s claim of huge gains in test scores when she was a classroom teacher were not as huge as reported.

The Michelle Rhee camp responded, of course, with an attempt to decry the blogger’s data.

Of course, there’s no way either Michelle Rhee or G.F. Brandenburg will admit to data analysis error, and thusly, the war escalates (as of this writing, Brandenburg has had the last word).

Who wins this battle? Again, nobody, but hey, it’s certainly enough entertainment to get one through a long week.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Panorama Theme by Themocracy

Switch to our mobile site